Having divided a popular coefficient thought to have handled the above numbers correctly,
I discovered NO coefficient within 819 which qualified for a coefficient for the 13 or for the
52,
However, a coefficient for both 13 and 52 DOES exist,
It had to have been done by a computer expert.
It was very strange to find it was done by a person who not only did not own a computer,
he did not see such a wonderful machine, He was a Maya who used dots and bars
for his star observations and a seashell for a zero. He could add, subtract, multiply and
divide as easily as I can with Arabic numbers.
So with 676 we can infer: 52 weeks in a year; 26 weeks in a half a year; 13 weeks in a quarter of a year (i.e.: A season, Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn). And a New Year was a great celebration of renewal for old and young alike.
A DISCLAIMER:
I discovered NO coefficient within 819 which qualified for a coefficient for the 13 or for the
52,
However, a coefficient for both 13 and 52 DOES exist,
"676 divided by 13 equals 52 and 676 divided by 52 equals 13"
It was very strange to find it was done by a person who not only did not own a computer,
he did not see such a wonderful machine, He was a Maya who used dots and bars
for his star observations and a seashell for a zero. He could add, subtract, multiply and
divide as easily as I can with Arabic numbers.
So with 676 we can infer: 52 weeks in a year; 26 weeks in a half a year; 13 weeks in a quarter of a year (i.e.: A season, Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn). And a New Year was a great celebration of renewal for old and young alike.
_________________________________________________________________________
It also tells us that no primitive entity could possibly think like us; ever. And it has been proven in anthropology and archaeology over and over again. Margaret Mead did an excellent study in the Pacific islands. And there was Mr. Leaky who discovered the first proto-human, after digging up more than seven tons of earth to find the rest of the skeleton that matched the jawbone he had first kicked up on a well-worn footpath..
As I began to study the Calendar stone of the Maya/Aztec cultures, I could see the fire serpents and N, E, W, S markers, and four units, Wind, Fire rain, Water to dampen the fire rain, and Jaguars who were as hungry as humans when they decided to leave their lairs in the mountain caves. Numbers associated with those events were 676, 364, 312, and 676. These numbers only complete three Ages of the Sun. . . . . 676 each age. The central numbers 364 and 312 are to be found in the "The History of the Mexicans through their Paintings." (by Phillips,.1883.) It is a short translation of the Codex Ramirez.
The information I uncovered never seemed to be Ages of the Sun, instead, it seems to be four events during one year. This has never been proven, and it does need further investigation.
The fact that there is in all the versions of the Calendar Stone. I still do not understand it. I still have questions of my own. Do any of you have any questions?
However, I do understand the MOD and COEFFICIENT process in Calculus. I had
a great teacher, who all but pounded the sequences into my ear over the telephone.
With those two elements, I was able to understand the rest of the calculus statement.
After turning it into a number-based problem, It was easier to understand even within
brackets, parenthesis, super and subscripts.
a great teacher, who all but pounded the sequences into my ear over the telephone.
With those two elements, I was able to understand the rest of the calculus statement.
After turning it into a number-based problem, It was easier to understand even within
brackets, parenthesis, super and subscripts.
There was an EXCEPTION---when I saw weeks made into year-cycles----not
normal for our Earth’s 360-degree orbit or its ability to spin one degree per day
to create a 360-day orbit and a 52-week year, even with the addition of 0.015th
of a degree.in every 24 hour spin.
normal for our Earth’s 360-degree orbit or its ability to spin one degree per day
to create a 360-day orbit and a 52-week year, even with the addition of 0.015th
of a degree.in every 24 hour spin.
It also was apparent the Earth’s spin adjusted itself to make the daily degree in 1.0456
[1.015] degree without knowing calculus or the 364-day; 52 week YEAR that contains
39 divided by 13-weeks [in each of three seasons] for the “Book of Destinies.”
Come to think of it----Earth also was a linguist-----who spoke ALL languages,
[1.015] degree without knowing calculus or the 364-day; 52 week YEAR that contains
39 divided by 13-weeks [in each of three seasons] for the “Book of Destinies.”
Come to think of it----Earth also was a linguist-----who spoke ALL languages,
The question will be: Does one only add one day per week, or was it more than
five days to the Native pre-conquest week: So, the main question here, is it
necessary to put all the Extra-ordinary inferred calculus in another paper, or
should I assume, if you are really interested in Earth Orbital self-adjustability----do
I just show the original abbreviations with new details---because Earth’s natural
measurements are ALREADY KNOWN to our Planet Earth.
five days to the Native pre-conquest week: So, the main question here, is it
necessary to put all the Extra-ordinary inferred calculus in another paper, or
should I assume, if you are really interested in Earth Orbital self-adjustability----do
I just show the original abbreviations with new details---because Earth’s natural
measurements are ALREADY KNOWN to our Planet Earth.
If you want to disagree; I have no problem looking another piece of the puzzle.
If anyone can offer a better solution than bringing back the 360-degree orbit
to which Earth itself uses to stay on course, no matter how planet Earth may change.
If anyone can offer a better solution than bringing back the 360-degree orbit
to which Earth itself uses to stay on course, no matter how planet Earth may change.
[To Repeat the natural Earth Cycle one more time: Since the orbit of the earth is
a constant 360 degrees, it was only the spin of one degree per 24 hours must
be changed. So the math should be 360 / 365.25 = 1,01458 [1.015]. Therefore,
the spin, in order to complete Earth’s 360-orbit, when the 24-hour day
a constant 360 degrees, it was only the spin of one degree per 24 hours must
be changed. So the math should be 360 / 365.25 = 1,01458 [1.015]. Therefore,
the spin, in order to complete Earth’s 360-orbit, when the 24-hour day
was self-adjusted to 01.01458 degrees for each 24-hour spin of one degree.
^*^*^*^*^*^*^^*^*^*^*^*^*^
Rome did not have calculus during those days. They decided to separate
the five and a quarter days into a separate entity, called a Wayeb that
they implemented in 1584. See historical note about Fra Francisco de
la Nava under “Veytia Calendar” 1975 edition of HMAI, IV, III p. 230.]
the five and a quarter days into a separate entity, called a Wayeb that
they implemented in 1584. See historical note about Fra Francisco de
la Nava under “Veytia Calendar” 1975 edition of HMAI, IV, III p. 230.]
v The veintena. Or the twenty-day, 5-week cycle, using only 4-days per week of
a first second and a third-year Trecena count, which should begin with Ik, and end with Caban as entered into the 3rd column of the Madrid Codex in the following-----
horizontal Trecena Serpent Calendar pages. [M-13 to M-18]
a first second and a third-year Trecena count, which should begin with Ik, and end with Caban as entered into the 3rd column of the Madrid Codex in the following-----
horizontal Trecena Serpent Calendar pages. [M-13 to M-18]
[All units of the horizontal Trecena have to be completed only up to 52 weeks
so that the next 12-cycle of the Vertical Trecena fits into Manik, Eb, Caban,
Ik. [See name chart for the inference using only the number 13 here----without
names.]
so that the next 12-cycle of the Vertical Trecena fits into Manik, Eb, Caban,
Ik. [See name chart for the inference using only the number 13 here----without
names.]
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
“ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “
Some Known Changes
In the year 1584 AD Imix was the GREGORIAN adjustment as the FIRST DAY of the first month was named 0 POP. Diego de Landa suggested 0-POPP in 1524 (Gates, 1987, 68).
Rome inserted these changes into the European calendar and inserted these changes into
the Mesoamerican calendar in 1583 for 1584 AD. No month names had been used before
1584 in the New World.
the Mesoamerican calendar in 1583 for 1584 AD. No month names had been used before
1584 in the New World.
tz Vertical Trecena inferred only for agriculture in connection with the Madrid Horizontal
Serpent Pages where {our Saturday and Sunday} designations were ignored.
The Vertical Trecena reads as follows:
Serpent Pages where {our Saturday and Sunday} designations were ignored.
The Vertical Trecena reads as follows:
Ik (1),
Manik,
Eb,
Cabán, This group is repeated three times.
[Then Ik (13) is added to complete a continuous loop.].
[Then Ik (13) is added to complete a continuous loop.].
[I have separated the thirteen count into three year-segments of four-day of 5 columns
for every 20 days.
Is the year count not the Trecena count to be used as vertical Trecena for each day per monthas assumed by some. This just creates a proper agricultural process for
a: burning year’ a planting year and a fruitful harvest the first year a milpa is planted andleaves that milpa two years to lie fallow. These procedures are necessary
for every 20 days.
Is the year count not the Trecena count to be used as vertical Trecena for each day per monthas assumed by some. This just creates a proper agricultural process for
a: burning year’ a planting year and a fruitful harvest the first year a milpa is planted andleaves that milpa two years to lie fallow. These procedures are necessary
for individual milpas to regenerate in often soil-poor conditions.
The last row of the Trecena just allows the three sectioned off year spans
to repeat themselves.
Nevertheless, this attempt of four days per week failed to create a correct 52-week
horizontal calendar, the following year, This inferred year is repeated; and is again
repeated for the third time.
horizontal calendar, the following year, This inferred year is repeated; and is again
repeated for the third time.
m A Calender month any one of 18 months. [Again, 0 POP and all other months
was a Gregorian adjustment by Rome for the New World calendar year 0-PPop.”]
Pop (1), Uo (2), Zip (3), Zotz (4), Tzep (5), Xul (6), Yaxkin (7), Mol (8),
Ch'en (9), Yax (10), Sac (11), Ceh (12), Mac (13), Kankin (14), Moan (15),
Pax (16), Kayab (17), Cumhu (18),
[Wayeb (19) Floyd's Text], (If a month has only n1, n2, n3, n4, and n5, for the
coefficient 819,
coefficient 819,
Four different coefficients had been compared, Each equaled 819= [If the year
n1 has 365 days, use Wayeb)], the rest of the formula inferred is to be found on
page 764, the second half of column one to the end of column two on page 765. He
completed time zones and a latitude zone but only those which could equal
n1 has 365 days, use Wayeb)], the rest of the formula inferred is to be found on
page 764, the second half of column one to the end of column two on page 765. He
completed time zones and a latitude zone but only those which could equal
364-day coefficients for your common denominator 819. He even indicated that
he was not completely positive of his premise.
(Lounsbury, Floyd, Circa 1974s, 760, number 3]]
he was not completely positive of his premise.
(Lounsbury, Floyd, Circa 1974s, 760, number 3]]
d day of the month, any one of the twenty days. Mod 19, i.e. of 20 days in
five weeks of four days each, [as found in the Madrid Codex in the Serpent
Trecena Horizontal Calendar pages.]
The Madrid Serpent pages list is different from common sequence usage.
That is IMIX was Rome's addition to the year-cycle of the Serpent
Calendar. When IK is used as the first day of the first year, The number
13 correctly meshes into One IK of the next 4-day-week cycle. for the Trecena
Horizontal year cycle.
Ik (1), Akbal (2), Kan (3), Chicсhán (4), Cimi (5) Manik (6), Lamat (7),
Muluc (8), Oc (9), Chuen (10), Eb (11), Ben (12), Ix (13), Men (14),
Cib (15), Cabán (16), Eznab (17), Cauac (18), Ahau (19), Imix (20),
h days of two haab's or 52 weeks = mod 360 days, [if 365, then Mod
364 +2[?] = every 6th year = 366 ]
364 +2[?] = every 6th year = 366 ]
cr day of calendar-round expressed in terms of coordinates tr, v, and h.
[For example “6 Etznab 11 Yax”. Floyd's original text; My input is: NO month
names in Mesoamerican calendars until 1583 for January First, 1584.]
t There was NO month. names in Mesoamerican calendars until 1583 to be
used for January First of 1584
used for January First of 1584
[For rwo split mountains separated by different dates, found in the Bodley Codex,
a 360 day-year calculation is necessary for a 52-week year.]
a 360 day-year calculation is necessary for a 52-week year.]
lc date in the long count: expressed in Maya numerals, usually of five places, of
the following:
n5, n4, n3, n2, n1, where n1 is the number of days in the kin position, n2 is the
number of winals, n3 the number of tuns; n4 the number of katuns, and n5
the number of baktuns.
[All of which when included in the calculation must Include 4 X 819, it is inferred
as the coefficient for Floyd's calculations.
as the coefficient for Floyd's calculations.
Yet only 864 / 52 = 15.614 winals-days or 16 as a whole number for their joined
Coefficients and called an h-aab. It is 26-weeks of an
inferred half a year. [Lounsbury. p. 770. ]
Day-count increments are normal without month names.]
[The above definitions are just suggested changes to Floyd Lounsbury's original
calculus statements Which indicated a 52-year cycle, which is a very awkward numeric conclusion. It makes his data a bit out of sync with the natural measurements of orbital time of our 26-week Earth.[H AA B]
dn distance number: (positive or negative) to be added to a given cr or lc or both;
expressed as a Maya coefficient for an inferred numerals for any number of pieces.
Even so, the Maya informed Morley the following about their on-going intentions for
future calendars:
future calendars:
“Let us permit our calendar year to gain on the true year as fast as it will. We
will allow our calendar to function without change, but when we erect upon it,
in addition to the official calendar date of its dedication, a calendar correction
for that particular date. In this way, no matter what month our calendar may
register, e shall always know, whenever we erect a monument, the position of
its corresponding date in the true [Maya/Aztec inferred] Trecena [Vertical and
Horizontal] year calculation.”
[Morley, Third Edition: 1956, Morley and Wm Gates as
will allow our calendar to function without change, but when we erect upon it,
in addition to the official calendar date of its dedication, a calendar correction
for that particular date. In this way, no matter what month our calendar may
register, e shall always know, whenever we erect a monument, the position of
its corresponding date in the true [Maya/Aztec inferred] Trecena [Vertical and
Horizontal] year calculation.”
[Morley, Third Edition: 1956, Morley and Wm Gates as
Translators on pages 229-230]
The above identifies the dn as a distance number. The above quote by Morley from his Maya informants tells us of a different purpose: That of making the dn exactly asthe same date as the primary date above it. In other words, the first date is the
date formula insisted upon by Rome in 1584. The dn date is the same day
using the older calendar of the Maya population.
date formula insisted upon by Rome in 1584. The dn date is the same day
using the older calendar of the Maya population.
[See the Borgia Code x Calendar for the 364 day-year which included the
260-day count for the Trecena in the middle.of two ugly rows created in Rome. It was
finally figured out why the Maya left out the two weekend days. It was a very accurate work-day
schedule when done to fit a work schedule (for Latitude or Climate] Milpa
of a Trecena assumed] management it managed to be for multiple harvests.
(Morley, 1956,768. Translator: Gates. Wm.)
Conclusions
A conclusion reached, is that, without searching for the beginnings or source should never
assume such unknown numbers are only useful when all data pertaining to such artificial
dating methods can be used in all phases of their calendar calculations. For Example: the
almost universal use of 819, that never seems to work as a planned. chart, no matter
how many charts can be created .
A Human was actually the creator of the original 360-calendar in eons past,
NOT a "god,"“ "Nough said.
assume such unknown numbers are only useful when all data pertaining to such artificial
dating methods can be used in all phases of their calendar calculations. For Example: the
almost universal use of 819, that never seems to work as a planned. chart, no matter
how many charts can be created .
A Human was actually the creator of the original 360-calendar in eons past,
NOT a "god,"“ "Nough said.
No comments:
Post a Comment