The simple structures, I can read, but when the glyphs change their faces, or become whole figures, I can not figure out
what you all are talking about. My understanding of the glyphs is that each tells a different story which is pertinent to
each of the replacements on a specific stela or monument., D. M. Urquidi, 2018, January.
When speaking of "gods" in any primitive situation, like calendars is to say that there never could be a human who actually did real thinking about numbers and learned how to put them into place.
This tells us that we are a bunch of computer nerds who believe our "god" is the computer.
It also tells us that no primitive entity could possible think like us; ever. And it has been proven
in anthropology and archaeology over and over again. Margaret Mead did an excellent study in the Pacific islands. As if Mr. Leaky who discovered the first proto-human, after digging more
than seven tons of earth to find the rest of the skeleton that matched the jawbone he had first
kicked up on a path he was traveling.
As I began to study the Calendar stone of the Maya/Aztec cultures, I could see the fire serpents and N, E, W, S markers, and four units, Wind, Fire rain, Water to dampen the fire rain, and Jaguars who were as hungry as humans when they decided to leave their lairs in the mountain caves. Numbers associated with those events were 676, 364, 312, and 676. These numbers only complete three Ages of the Sun. . . . . 676 each age. The central numbers 364 and 312 may not be accurate but ccan be found in the The History of the Mexicians through their Paintings. (by Phillips,.1883.) It is a short translation of the Codex Ramirez.
The information I uncovered never seemed tobe Ages of the Sun, instead it seems to be four events during one year. This has never been proven, but really does need further investigation.
The fact that there is a loop-hole in all the versions of the Sun Stone. I still do not understand it.
I still have questions of my own. Do any of you have any questions?
the process into my ear over the telephone. With those two elements, I was able to understand the rest of
a calculus statement. After turning it into a number-based problem, It was easier to understand even within
brackets, parenthesis, super and subscripts.
degree orbit or its ability to spin one degree per day to create a 360-day 52-week year.
alculus or the 364-day; 52 week YEAR that contains 26 + 13-weeks [three-seasons] for the “Book of Destinies.”
Come to think of it----Earth also was a linguist-----who spoke ALL languages,
conquest week: So, the main question here, is it necessary to put all the Extradinary inferred calculus in
another paper, or do I assume, if you are really interested in Earth Orbital self-adjustability----do I just
show the original abbreviations with new details----or just “Cut to the Quick” because Earth’s natural
measurements are ALREADY KNOWN to Planet Earth.
solution than bringing back the 360-degree orbit to which Earth itself uses to stay on course, no matter how
planet Earth may change.
it was only the spin of one degree per 24 hours must be changed. So the math should be 360 / 365.25
to 01.01458 degree for each 24-hour spin.
Francisco de la Nava under “Veytia Calendar” 1975 edition of HMAI, IV, III p. 230.]
12-cycle of the Vertical Trecena fits into Manik, Eb, Caban, Ik. [See name chart for the
inferrence using only the number 13 here----without names.]
month was named 0 POP. Diego de Landa suggested 0-POPP in 1524 (Gates, 1987, 68).
Rome inserted these changes into the European calendar and inserted these changes into
the Mesoamerican calendar in 1583 for 1584 AD. No month names had been used before
that date in the New World.
Cabán, This group is repeated three times. Then Ik (13)
is added to complete a continuous loop.
year, This inferred year is repeated; and is again repeated for the third time.
year calculation.” [Morley, Third Edition: 1956, Morley and Wm Gates as
Translators on pps 229-230]
tells us of a different purpose: That of making the dn exactly the same date as the primary date above it.
In other words the first date is the date formula insisted upon by Rome in 1584. The dn date is the same
day, but is using the older calendar of the Maya population.
the Maya left out the two weekend days .It was a very accurate work-day schedule when done to fit
the Latin or Latitude or Climate] Milpa Trecena assumed] management it managed to be for multiple
harvests.(Morley, 1956,768. Translator: Gates. Wm.)
such unknown numbers are only useful, when all data pertaining to such artificial dating methods can be
used in all phases of their calendar calculations. For Example: the almost universal use of 819, that never
seems to work as charted out as planned.
Also that a Human was actually the creator of the original 360-calendar in eons past NOT a "god,"“